Climate Curves

Climate Intelligence & Live Weather

Global climate trends, ENSO monitoring, Arctic & Atlantic oscillations, regional impacts, live radar, and snowpack tracking.

Glossary — Key Terms

Global climate indicators: temperature, greenhouse gases, sea level, and ice. Dashed lines show statistical projections to 2050.

Loading
Loading
Loading
F001F009F029F030 CO‍₂–Temperature coupling surged from r=0.32 (pre-1980, non-significant) to r=0.95 (post-1980). Sensitivity: ~1.1°C per 100 ppm. CO‍₂ growth rate tripled since the 1960s (0.86→2.40 ppm/yr) but has plateaued since 2010. CO₂ and temperature are synchronous — no meaningful lag detected (detrended r=0.65). Removing volcanic cooling years does not fix the pre-1980 weakness, confirming it is a real structural break.
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
F005F024 Wildfire–temperature link is largely spurious — both variables share an upward time trend, but after detrending, the year-to-year correlation drops to r=−0.10 (p=0.51). Western summer heat is the best single predictor (r=0.63). Drought–wildfire link is concurrent only — prior-year drought has no lagged predictive power. Multi-predictor model (PDSI + summer temp) explains 42% of wildfire variance.
Loading
Loading

About the Projections

Dashed projection lines are statistical extrapolations of historical trends (polynomial or linear curve fits), not physics-based climate model outputs. Actual outcomes depend on future emission pathways.

ENSO & natural oscillations: Regional precipitation and drought projections use ENSO-aware decomposition — the secular climate trend is separated from the El Niño–Southern Oscillation signal (2–7 year cycles).

For scenario-based projections, see IPCC AR6 WG1 (2021).

US regional precipitation, snowfall, drought, and seasonal temperature changes. Use the dropdowns to toggle between historical and projected views. ENSO filters show how El Niño and La Niña years shift regional patterns.

Loading
F013 Eastern US is getting significantly wetter (+0.3–0.4 in/decade over 130 years). The Great Lakes region shows the largest increase at +8.4%. The West shows no significant trend, though post-1970 data hints at drying. High western variability (CV=24%) makes trend detection difficult.
Loading
Loading
F010 No statistically significant national SWE decline detected (p=0.18). However, this masks regional divergence: the Pacific Northwest shows a significant decline (-0.8 in/decade, p=0.003). Peak SWE timing has shifted 5–7 days earlier since 1980. Elevation matters: sites above 8,000 ft show less decline than lower sites.
Loading
Loading
Loading
F016 Peak SWE date is shifting 2.4 days/decade earlier across western mountains (p=0.063). 10 of 11 SNOTEL stations show earlier melt timing, with Wolf Creek Summit (−8.3 days/decade) and Lizard Head Pass (−6.1 days/decade) significant. Earlier melt accelerates spring runoff and reduces late-season water supply.
Loading
Loading
F019 Water Year Health shows no significant long-term decline (p=0.47) despite the 2020s being the worst modern decade. High interannual variability masks any secular trend. Drought persistence (autocorrelation=0.23) means dry years tend to cluster.

About the Projections

Dashed projection lines are statistical extrapolations of historical trends, not physics-based climate model outputs.

For scenario-based projections, see IPCC AR6 WG1 (2021).

Estimated climate-health risk indicators. These are conceptual models derived from climate data — not measured health outcomes. For observed health data, see CDC Climate and Health (cdc.gov/climateandhealth).

Loading
Loading
F015 The Climate Stress Index combines 7 normalized indicators (temp, CO₂, drought, Arctic ice, sea level, ocean heat, wildfire). It reveals a relentless, near-monotonic escalation (R²=0.87). The 2020s average (+3.0) is 4.6 standard deviations above the 1960s. 2025 is the most stressed year on record (CSI=3.70).
Loading
Loading
Loading
F007 La Niña years produce 40% more Atlantic hurricanes than El Niño years (8.0 vs 5.7 storms/season). The major hurricane rate doubles: 2.6 vs 1.3. This is driven by reduced wind shear over the Atlantic during La Niña. The relationship is strongest June–November.

El Niño–Southern Oscillation monitoring: ONI timeline, Niño region SSTs, phase frequency analysis, SOI correlation, MEI heatmap, teleconnection impacts, and ENSO prediction engine.

Loading

ONI Methodology

The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) is NOAA CPC's primary indicator for monitoring El Niño and La Niña. It tracks the 3-month running mean of SST anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region (5°N–5°S, 170°W–120°W).

Thresholds: El Niño = ONI ≥ +0.5°C for 5+ consecutive seasons | La Niña = ONI ≤ −0.5°C for 5+ consecutive seasons

Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
F023 ONI, MEI, and SOI are interchangeable for ENSO classification (r>0.85 between all pairs). Surprising finding: Niño 1+2 (far eastern Pacific) is a better predictor of US winter temperatures (r=0.30, p<0.01) than the standard Niño 3.4 region.
Loading
F022 ENSO has no detectable influence on methane growth rate (r≈0, p=0.94). Despite tropical wetland CH₄ sources being climate-sensitive, the global signal does not track ENSO phase. Methane’s post-2007 resurgence appears driven by factors independent of Pacific SST variability.
Loading
Loading

ENSO Prediction Engine

Statistical ensemble combining persistence, Ridge regression, and analog methods. Validated on 2020–2026 out-of-sample.

Loading

What is the ONI?

The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) is the 3-month running mean of SST anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region. NOAA declares El Niño when ONI reaches +0.5°C for 5 consecutive seasons, and La Niña when it drops to −0.5°C.

Loading

Forecast Precipitation Impact

Probability-weighted expected precipitation anomaly from the ENSO prediction engine. Skillful out to ~6 months; marginal 7–9mo; low skill beyond 10mo.

1mo2mo3mo 4mo5mo6mo 7mo8mo9mo 10mo11mo12mo
Loading
Loading
F012F026 ENSO × AO compound states amplify winter temperature anomalies. El Niño + negative AO produces the warmest winters nationally (+1.2°F above normal). La Niña + positive AO drives the coldest (-0.8°F). Despite Arctic amplification, compound event frequency is not significantly changing — the most extreme compound state (EN/−AO) remains episodic.

Seasonal Outlook — ENSO-Conditioned Projections

How the current ENSO state affects seasonal conditions: snowpack, wildfire risk, and temperature patterns.

Loading
Loading
Loading

Data Health Monitor

SourceProviderStatusLast UpdatedRows

Data Sources: NOAA CPC (ONI), NOAA PSL (Niño Indices, SOI, MEI v2), IRI Columbia (ENSO forecasts) | NOAA CAG (Seasonal Temps) | NIFC (Wildfire) | NOAA HURDAT2 (Hurricanes)

Climate teleconnections: how major oscillation patterns across the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific interact to drive global weather.

Global Climate Pattern Interaction Map

Browse any month from 1950–present to see how each oscillation was behaving.

Loading

Oscillation Cross-Correlations

Pearson correlation between monthly index values over the full overlapping record.

Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading

ENSO ↔ Arctic & Atlantic Interactions

How Pacific ENSO variability couples with Arctic and Atlantic oscillations.

Loading

ENSO Phase Composite

Average index values during El Nino, Neutral, and La Nina months.

Loading

Lagged Cross-Correlation

Correlation between ENSO (Nino 3.4) this month and each index N months later.

Loading
Loading

December AO/NAO Forecast Skill

Correlation between December AO/NAO and the following winter's regional temperatures. December is the critical window when the winter pattern locks in.

Loading

Three-Way ENSO × AO × NAO Interactions

Rigorous interaction analysis with FDR multiple-testing correction, bootstrap 95% confidence intervals, Cohen's d effect sizes, and train/test temporal validation (pre-1990 / post-1990).

Loading

Triple-State Winter Temperature Anomalies

DJF temperature anomaly (°F) by combined ENSO × AO × NAO state across nine US climate regions, 1950–present. Cells with n<5 winters are flagged as low-confidence.

Loading

AO Progression in EN + Negative-AO Winters

December → January → February AO evolution within compound winters, with bootstrap 95% CIs.

Loading

NAO Forecast Skill, Stratified by ENSO Phase

December NAO → winter temperature correlation, separately for active vs. neutral ENSO years.

Loading
F031F032F033F034F035F036 Triple-mode classification beats two-way. The EN/AO−/NAO− super-state produces the coldest US winters — Southeast −3.0°F (Cohen's d=−1.7), Central −2.4°F, both surviving FDR correction. Adding NAO to the ENSO×AO classification raises explained variance by 9–17% in the eastern US. Counterintuitively, the ENSO→AO link is weaker in winter than summer (r=−0.05 vs −0.16; July strongest at r=−0.31). The textbook stratospheric pathway has effectively broken down post-1990 (r=+0.04). NAO's winter forecast skill is entirely ENSO-phase dependent: r=0.5 during active ENSO, r=0.1 (non-significant) during Neutral. AMO does not modulate the teleconnection itself, only the background state on which it acts.

Key Findings from the Historical Record

  • Strong El Nino events tend to push the NAO/AO negative in the following 1–4 months, increasing cold-outbreak risk for the US East Coast and Europe.
  • La Nina tends to favor positive AO/NAO, reinforcing the polar vortex and driving mild, wet winters in Northern Europe.
  • The AMO operates on 60–80 year cycles and modulates the ENSO–Atlantic link.
  • The ENSO–NAO coupling is not stationary — rolling correlations show decades where the link is strong and periods where it nearly vanishes.
  • When El Nino coincides with negative AO/NAO, the combination produces the most extreme winter impacts.
F002F008F027 Statistical analysis confirms: ENSO–AO/NAO coupling is weak in monthly data (r=−0.08 to −0.15) but emerges at seasonal lags. AO/NAO provide modest winter temperature forecast skill for the Northeast (r=0.3–0.4) and Central US. Critical timing discovery: November AO/NAO has zero predictive skill (0/18 tests significant), but December AO/NAO shows strong skill (11/18 significant, national NAO r=0.48). The winter pattern locks in during December.

What Do These Oscillations Mean?

Arctic Oscillation (AO)

Measures the pressure difference between the Arctic and mid-latitudes. Positive AO = strong polar vortex. Negative AO = weak vortex, allowing Arctic air to plunge south.

North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)

Pressure seesaw between the Icelandic Low and Azores High. Controls European and East Coast winter weather.

Atlantic Multidecadal Osc. (AMO)

Multi-decade swings in North Atlantic SSTs (60–80 year cycle). Modulates hurricane activity and long-term rainfall.

How They Interact

ENSO can influence NAO/AO with a 2–4 month lag. AMO modulates the background state on which ENSO and NAO operate.

Data Sources: NOAA PSL (AO, NAO, AMO indices) | NOAA CPC (ONI) | NOAA PSL (SOI, MEI v2)

A primer on the chemistry and physics of Earth's atmosphere through its interactions with photons. Why sunlight drives nearly every interesting reaction up there, why certain molecules dominate absorption, and where atmospheric CO‍₂ comes from.

1. Which Photons Can Break Which Bonds

The single most important rule of atmospheric photochemistry: a photon breaks a bond only when its energy exceeds the bond’s dissociation energy. Photon energy scales as E = hc / λ, so shorter wavelengths carry more punch.

Loading
How to read this: the cyan curve is photon energy as a function of wavelength. Each dashed line is an atmospheric bond. Wherever the curve crosses a dashed line, you’ve found the longest wavelength capable of breaking that bond. N≡N at 9.8 eV is the strongest bond on Earth’s upper atmosphere — it takes extreme-UV photons (<127 nm) found only in the thermosphere. NO‍₂ at 3.0 eV is the weakest — near-UV (<410 nm) breaks it, which is what makes ground-level smog chemistry possible.

2. The Two Photon Populations — Sun & Earth

Sun (~5780 K) peaks at 0.5 μm — the middle of visible light. Earth (~288 K) peaks at 10 μm — deep in the thermal infrared. Wien’s law (λmax = 2898/T) sets the peak positions; Stefan–Boltzmann (P ∝ T&sup4;) sets the absolute powers.

Loading
The two curves barely overlap. That’s the entire trick of the greenhouse effect: CO‍₂ and H‍₂O are nearly transparent to incoming solar wavelengths but grab outgoing thermal photons aggressively. The atmosphere acts as a one-way valve.

3. Where Each Absorber Lives on the Spectrum

The same two blackbody curves with the major atmospheric absorption bands superimposed. The vertical bars show which wavelengths each molecule absorbs — the spectral fingerprint of each greenhouse gas.

Loading
The atmospheric window at 8–13 μm is the gap where neither H‍₂O nor CO‍₂ absorbs much — Earth’s heat escapes mainly through there. Any new absorber in that window (CFCs, N‍₂O, CH‍₄) has outsized greenhouse impact: CFC-12 has a per-molecule warming potential ~10,000× CO‍₂ because it’s filling a gap rather than competing with already-saturated bands.

4. Why CO‍₂ and H‍₂O Punch Above Their Weight

N‍₂ (78%) and O‍₂ (21%) make up 99% of the atmosphere but contribute almost nothing to the greenhouse effect. The selection rule: a vibrational mode is IR-active only if it changes the molecule’s dipole moment. Homonuclear diatomics (N≡N, O=O) have no dipole, no dipole change — IR-invisible.

Loading

The four atmospheric absorbers

N‍₂ — nearly transparent

Homonuclear: no dipole, no IR absorption. Only breaks under extreme UV (<127 nm) in the thermosphere. Its triple bond is one of the strongest in chemistry — this is why nitrogen fixation is so biologically expensive.

O‍₂ — the UV gatekeeper

Also homonuclear, so IR-invisible. But its electronic structure has accessible excited states: Schumann–Runge bands strip out all UV-C below 242 nm before it can reach the lower atmosphere.

CO‍₂ — the right molecule, right place

Linear triatomic. Its bending mode at 15 μm sits dead-center on Earth’s thermal emission peak. The symmetric stretch is IR-inactive (symmetry); the asymmetric stretch at 4.3 μm is strong but sits where there’s less Earth emission.

H‍₂O — the messy dominator

Bent (~104.5°) and permanently polar. All three vibrational modes are IR-active, plus a pure rotational spectrum in the far-IR. Bands are everywhere across the IR — the strongest greenhouse gas by total radiative contribution.

5. The Bond-Breaking Ladder

Each bar is the longest wavelength capable of breaking that bond. Color codes which atmospheric layer that wavelength is still abundant in — once a layer absorbs a photon, lower layers don’t see it.

Loading

6. The Chapman Cycle — Why There’s an Ozone Layer

Sydney Chapman, 1930. The most famous piece of atmospheric photochemistry — a self-sustaining cycle that converts UV-C into heat and explains why the ozone layer sits at 25–30 km altitude.

1. O‍₂ + hν (λ < 242 nm) → 2 O
2. O + O‍₂ + M → O‍₃ + M  (M = third body, usually N‍₂)
3. O‍₃ + hν (λ < 320 nm) → O‍₂ + O
4. O‍₃ + O → 2 O‍₂

The three-body collision in step 2 requires both UV photons (high altitude) and dense enough air for collisions (low altitude). That trade-off pins the ozone peak to 25–30 km. UV absorption in steps 1+3 also heats the stratosphere from the top — that’s why temperature inverts there, killing convection and making the stratosphere the smooth, stable layer airliners cruise in.

7. Catalytic Ozone Destruction — Why CFCs Were Such a Disaster

Pure Chapman chemistry predicts more ozone than we observe. The real stratosphere has catalytic cycles that destroy O‍₃ without being consumed themselves. A single Cl atom can take out tens of thousands of ozone molecules.

1. X + O‍₃ → XO + O‍₂
2. XO + O → X + O‍₂
Net: O‍₃ + O → 2 O‍₂  (X regenerated — catalytic)

The four major catalytic families are NOx, HOx, ClOx, and BrOx. The Antarctic ozone hole adds a wrinkle: heterogeneous chemistry on polar stratospheric clouds releases active Cl from reservoir species (HCl, ClONO‍₂), and a ClO+ClO dimer cycle takes over in the lower stratosphere where atomic O is scarce. The Montreal Protocol (1987) is the rare environmental success story — stratospheric chlorine peaked around 2000 and is slowly declining.

8. Tropospheric OH — The Atmosphere’s Detergent

Down where we live, the dominant photon-driven species is the hydroxyl radical, OH. Extremely reactive (lifetime ~1 second), it removes most pollutants from the atmosphere — methane, CO, volatile organics. Its production is a chain reaction starting with ozone photolysis.

1. O‍₃ + hν (λ < 320 nm) → O(¹D) + O‍₂
2. O(¹D) + H‍₂O → 2 OH
3. OH + CH‍₄ → CH‍₃ + H‍₂O  (methane removal — the main CH‍₄ sink)

The atmospheric lifetime of methane (~9 years) is set almost entirely by reaction with OH. If you emit a lot of CO, it competes for OH and methane lifetime gets longer — an active debate in atmospheric science is whether global OH is being depleted and what that means for the methane budget.

9. Photochemical Smog — NO‍₂ Photolysis

The chemistry behind “ground-level ozone” warnings on hot summer days. The starring photon-driven reaction is NO‍₂ photolysis — the only significant source of ozone in the troposphere.

1. NO‍₂ + hν (λ < 410 nm) → NO + O
2. O + O‍₂ + M → O‍₃ + M
3. NO + O‍₃ → NO‍₂ + O‍₂  (VOC-fueled cycles tip the balance toward O‍₃ buildup)

The cruel irony: stratospheric ozone is a UV shield we want lots of; tropospheric ozone is a respiratory irritant and powerful greenhouse gas we want much less. Same molecule, totally different role depending on altitude. Wildfire smoke (VOCs) + traffic NOx + high-altitude UV makes Front Range summer ozone among the worst in the country.

10. The Rise of CO‍₂

Pre-industrial CO‍₂ was ~280 ppm. We’ve added roughly 150 ppm — a ~53% increase — almost all of it in the last 150 years, with the rate accelerating. This is the highest atmospheric CO‍₂ concentration in over 2 million years.

Loading

11. Where the CO‍₂ Comes From

Total global anthropogenic CO‍₂ emissions in 2025 are ~41 Gt. About 90% comes from fossil fuels and cement, 10% from land use change (mostly deforestation).

Loading
Loading
About half of our emissions are absorbed by ocean and land sinks every year — without them, atmospheric CO‍₂ would already be near 550 ppm. Both sinks are vulnerable: droughts and wildfires weaken the land sink, and the ocean is acidifying (CO‍₂ + H‍₂O → H‍₂CO‍₃) as it absorbs CO‍₂.

12. Annual Emissions Over Time

Annual emissions have grown ~20-fold since 1900. About half of all CO‍₂ humans have ever emitted has been released since around 1990. Visible dips are real economic events — Great Depression, oil shock, 2008 crisis, COVID.

Loading

13. The Photon Impact — Logarithmic Radiative Forcing

At the center of the 15 μm CO‍₂ band, every IR photon is already absorbed within hundreds of meters — the band is saturated. Adding CO‍₂ works only at the band edges, which is why forcing scales logarithmically with concentration: ΔF ≈ 5.35 × ln(C / C‍₀).

Loading
Each doubling of CO‍₂ adds ~3.7 W/m² of radiative forcing — regardless of starting concentration. The logarithm cuts two ways: the atmosphere never really “saturates” (we can keep adding warming indefinitely), but each additional ppm matters less than the last (aggressive emission cuts now have outsized impact). Current concentration (~430 ppm vs 280 baseline) gives ΔF ≈ 2.3 W/m² — about +0.7 K of bare radiative warming, amplified by ~2× through water vapor, ice-albedo, and cloud feedbacks.

Six Unifying Principles

Photon energy sets the chemistry

Visible photons excite vibrations; UV breaks bonds; EUV ionizes. Below ~242 nm you can break O‍₂; below ~127 nm you can break N‍₂.

Selection rules decide absorption

A molecule absorbs only at quantum-allowed transitions. N‍₂/O‍₂ are transparent in the visible because they have no allowed transitions there.

Catalytic cycles are the most dangerous

When the active species regenerates each cycle, tiny amounts cause enormous damage. CFCs and OH both follow this template.

Pressure controls which reactions dominate

Three-body reactions (O + O‍₂ + M → O‍₃) need dense air. Altitude shifts which chemistry runs even when the same photons are available.

Lifetime decides global reach

A molecule must live long enough to arrive where it acts. CFCs (50–100 yr) survive the troposphere intact and deliver chlorine aloft; OH (~1 s) cleans the troposphere precisely because it disappears fast. CO‍₂'s multi-century lifetime is why emissions today commit centuries of forcing; methane's ~12-year lifetime is why CH‍₄ cuts pay off quickly.

Forcing is logarithmic in ppm, linear in cumulative emissions

ΔF = 5.35 · ln(C/C‍₀) gives ~3.7 W/m² per doubling of CO‍₂ regardless of starting concentration. The climate system converts that to ~1 K bare Planck response, amplified to ~3 K by water-vapor, ice-albedo, and cloud feedbacks. Yet warming scales linearly with cumulative emissions — ~0.45 K per 1000 GtCO‍₂ (TCRE). The log dependence on ppm and the linear dependence on cumulative carbon are the same fact viewed from opposite ends.

Reference data: NOAA GML Mauna Loa (CO‍₂); Global Carbon Budget 2025 (emissions); IPCC AR6 WG1 (radiative forcing); HITRAN (absorption lines). Bond energies and reaction rates from standard atmospheric chemistry references (Seinfeld & Pandis, Brasseur & Solomon).

Live precipitation radar, snow cover imagery, and SNOTEL station data. Data updates automatically from public APIs.

Data: RainViewer (Precipitation Radar) | Iowa State Mesonet (NEXRAD) | NASA GIBS (VIIRS Snow Cover) | NOAA NOHRSC (SWE) | USDA NRCS SNOTEL (Snowpack)

Glossary — Key Terms